- Driving through Bedfrodshrie #
- Ooh, we’re not the only gays at the wedding reception. #
- Playing drunken pool. The best kind. #
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
So, one distinct feature of my trip to Munich was Lederhosen.
I was recently forwarded a joke along the lines of daft American tourists who’d been to Germany and not seen any atual Lederhosen – well, I can report that in Munich in July they were definitely in evidence. Our host for the weekend said that people started wearing them in the late spring, once the beer gardens opened up again, and that they got progressively more popular as the weather got hotter. And by the time Oktoberfest comes around they’re practically compulsory.
Here is some documentary proof that people do wear them. Random Germans (presumably) going about daily life in central Munich
I was certainly intrigued by them, and when I saw that you could buy them in C&A, I decided to at least have a go. So one afternoon, I picked out lederhosen, a rustic shirt and snuck into a changing room with my camera and the outfit. As if by magic…
I couldn’t quite get the straps on right. But the big surprise was that they are really, really comfortable. The leather is soft suede, which feels really good, and there’s plenty of movement. The interesting rustic shirt had metal button detail finishing, and the whole ensemble was pretty nice.
But it did cost nearly €100, and I reluctantly decided it wouldn’t be money well spent on an outfit I’d almost never wear at home. And there was also the issue of cleaning them. Apparently, you don’t. Urgh!
I did see some more affordable baby-lederhosen in the window of a specific lederhosen shop, but on sending a picture-message home to my nephew’s parents, I got a pretty clear steer that this would not go down well back home.
Whilst browsing the traditional German clothes shops, I found two further things of note. 1) Dirndls (the dress the woman is wearing in the photo at the top) are masses cheaper than lederhosen. But I figured if I was never really going to find an excuse to wear lederhosen, I definitely wasn’t going to find one to squeeze into a dirndl. And 2) the Wolpertinger:
I have been enjoying the guest posts on Iain Dale’s blog – although I have come to them weeks late, and I have had to wait a while until I’ve had the time to give them a slightly closer reading than I give most of his content.
Special mention for last week’s post on German involvement in international diplomacy. I had no idea. Good for them. Our damaged national psyche does us no good when we can only think of Germans as Nazis. Hardly any Brit would consider Germany as a holiday destination; our arthouse cinemas have French films coming out of their ears, but German cinema hardly ever features, despite a healthy tradition of film-making in German-speaking countries.
I’ve been mentally writing blog-posts about my time in Munich last month, but haven’t actually typed anything up yet…
There’s a useful “what sort of job would suit you?” questionaire on the Learndirect website – but I think they missed a trick by not having it end with a badge you can post to your social network of choice.
They think I’d be good at something in the DATA field or something in the FINDING OUT arena. Not a bad match for what I do now, I suppose.
Remember the giant inflatable turd that lost its moorings, and flew over Switzerland, breaking into a children’s home and taking down some power lines?
The Flickr Blog has a photo of it.
Today’s factoid was going to be “$deity on a bike, it costs over £1.50 to boil enough water to fill a teapot!!” which I’d got from this link in today’s B3ta newsletter.
Then I read more closely and saw it said 1.57p, and I felt a little better.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
So, I awoke this morning, just, turned on my phone… and no more happy chirps from all my online friends telling me how their day was going. I missed the Beaver of Bad News; I missed news from thoroughlygood about his appointment with his doctor, and a few other bits of information that are not earth-shattering but for the last year or so have been part of my daily routine.
And I got online here and eventually found and approved the comments left on the previous post, too.
Rather than answer them in the comments, I thought I would start a new post. I did, of course, realise I was getting something for nothing, and practically every time I have tried to recruit a new person to the twitterverse almost the first question has been, “How does that work, financially? How are Twitter making ends meet?” So I entirely understand that this day has been long coming, and shouldn’t be all that much of a surprise. It makes a little more sense than when Orange killed Wildfire. It is still a wrench, however.
Then there were suggestions of workarounds. I have started using Cellity (although I don’t yet like it much) because I’m the sort of person who does have a smart phone and can install apps, and does have a 3G connection. There are people on my contact list who don’t have that option, and will be impossible to convince of the merits of upgrading to a wazzocky new phone just because of the changing status of Twitter.
There was a slightly weird comment along the lines of “You want it, you pay for it” which isn’t an option – there isn’t a button to say “I’ll pay for these text messages” and the email from Twitter just said their calculations came up with a nice round $1000 per user per year on 250 messages a week. Doing the maths makes that more than I currently pay Orange for all my mobile services (apart from SMS whilst abroad, which cost me dear this year and the occasional Dropped-My-Phone-And-Broke-It tax). I’m not at all averse to paying for good internet services I use regularly – I support all sorts of things from Goosync to Wikipedia – but £50 a month seems a bit steep.
Another slightly hostile comment along the lines of “you’ll just have to have more mobile phone masts in your ward.” Erm, what?! I have used my phone extensively in my ward, including 3G services, and I’m not aware of any black spots. We’re a city, we were probably ahead of the curve when it came to mobile phone masts.
And the suggestions about continuing with a mobile phone service at our conference next month. Well, yes, it is technically possible, but it’s gone from a 2-step simple solution
… to something a whole lot more complicated
It would have been possible, but Twitter made it all easier. Now that’s all gone, gone. (fx rents clothes asunder)
As for the relative finances of the Lib Dems vs Twitter, who knows? The Lib Dems certainly don’t have Twitter’s reach. And Lib Dem Voice, who would have been offering the service, certainly have next to nothing in their account at the moment.
And another thing!
It’s just occurred to me that I lose some of the really helpful synergy between Twitter and IwantSandy (another free service I have come to rely on), who I had set up to send text messages to my phone to remind me of stuff. I need reminding to check my voicemail, to take the bin out on a Thursday, and which bin it is this week. I’m lost, I’m lost, wail, wail.
PS I hope GMail isn’t next.
An email arrives essentially telling me that the folks behind Twitter have finally realised they can’t afford to continue sending millions of text messages out for free. Although they have come to some arrangements with mobile phone carriers in other countries, the UK number has been removed from service with immediate effect. You can still send messages to it, but it will no longer send any messages back to you.
This pretty effectively kills Twitter the way I’ve been using it for the past few… years? Months? I imagine the thing I’ve been doing on this blog will continue, but it will be much harder to use it to communicate instantly. One of the good points has been the fairly instant replies you get to questions and jokes from the random set of people who follow you and you follow.
You can still get at the twitter data using either a mobile phone web browser or a third party app like Cellity, but that does take away the simplicity. I don’t suppose my mother’s mobile phone could do either, for starters. And for me, there will no longer be that constant stream of updates – I regularly get through my allowance of 250 messages a week. Life will be much quieter without the constant phone chirp.
And it rather detracts from our plans to have an instant messaging service at Lib Dem Conference too. That’s a shame – it would have been pretty cool.
EDIT: the rant continues here.