A number of those present at the conference are not here because they are party members, but because they want to influence those of us who are. When I was wandering around the conference hall finding people to talk to, two of them met that category.
The podcast below hears from Brian Berry, from the Federation of Master Builders; and Guy Aitchison, representing Power 2010.
We asked delegates if their constituency was ready for the General election; if Nick Clegg was right on tuition fees; how a mansion tax would go down in their area; and how they were campaigning online.
Answering our questions were Tom Holvey and Chris Wiggin, from York, Katy Gordon for Glasgow North, Alan Bullion from Tunbridge Wells / Sevenoaks and Brendan D’Cruz from St Albans.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Whilst the LDV team is out tonight enjoying, in our various abstemious ways, the Liberal Drinks event at Bournemouth’s Goat and Tricycle tonight, we thought we’d bring you the tape of last night’s BOTY ceremony.
Sadly the audio version can not to justice to the range of visual feasts the evening provided. Stephen’s milliner will be most disappointed; the ice sculptors know their art is fleeting; and we have really only just rounded up all the flamingoes.
But it was a striking evening for a number of reasons, as we hope the audio will show. Firstly the venue was packed and there were a few nascent grumbles that will need to be addressed if we continue to grow. We had a really good turnout, with at least three MPs.
Secondly, somehow we were deemed important enough for an ordinary member of the Bournemouth public to gatecrash our event and berate us for being rich and not representing her. It must be a frustrating thing to feel so disenfranchised from politics and yet live in a town that’s regularly invaded by politicos.
Finally, in the words of all judges of all awards, ever, we were struck by the quality and elephants variety demonstrated by the Lib Dem blogosphere in the last year. Charge and raise your glasses to ever greater improvement in the year to come.
Photos: Alex Folkes – http://www.flickr.com/photos/libdems
There are now many ways of getting your brain around Vince Cable’s keynote speech. Read it on the party website. Hear our podcast below. See what ePolitix thinks – or the Guardian, for that matter.
There was much that was really important that jumped out at me from the speech – here are my favourite bits:
We should not be taken in by the hysterical nonsense about the country being bankrupt. It isn’t.
The Tories are currently getting a free rein to slash budgets. Tories like cutting public expenditure, so the opportunity comes to them like manna from heaven. By making great hay of the idea that we are massively in debt they have all the cover to need to make the evil spending cuts they wanted to make all along without taking any of the flak. Labour do not have the standing to take them on on this, so it is vitally important that we do.
Spending first. If public spending is cut in the usual way – slash and burn – there will be great damage to local and national services. Good will be cut with bad. Front line services will be butchered and lower paid workers will bear the brunt of cuts. […]
The Liberal Democrat approach to spending, is fundamentally different from the Tories. The Tories propose cuts, carried out in secret behind closed doors after the Election, if they win. We want an open, democratic debate about priorities. They want to control everything from Whitehall – just like Labour. We believe in local government. Local decision making is more accountable and more efficient. This requires lifting the dead hand of centralisation and scrapping the command and control quangos who treat local elected representatives like children. We would give additional roles to councils through health commissioning. And with that duty should go responsibility including more local revenue raising powers including business rates.
This is the vital counterbalance to Clegg’s “savage” cuts. This is Vince being measured, realistic and taking every step needed to engage the public sector in finding the economies necessary. Almost everyone who works in the public sector knows there are efficiencies to be made. It’s vital we continue with campaigns like “In the Know” to keep the public sector onside and not alienate them. The bureaucracy is a vast army who must be turned to work for the public good. That means, however, that the public sector unions and management have be nimble enough to use their powers to tackle waste and to tackle wasteful projects without grumbling. The quid pro quo will be: avoid slash and burn by taking responsibility for the public purse.
We must also lead the debate on tax reform as a Liberal government did a century ago with the People’s Budget. We should aim to shift the tax burden further from income – work, savings and innovation – onto pollution – the green tax switch. Switching taxation onto financial pollution – questionable transactions of no social and economic value. And onto land values instead of penalising productive investment. But at the heart of our tax plans must be a commitment to social justice.
Explicit links to LVT? Some in the party will be jumping for joy at that!
We need a financing mechanism which can meet the investment needs of big long-term projects which will lie at the heart of a green economy: tidal power, high speed rail, carbon capture and storage, telecommunications infrastructure.
Yes, yes, yes with knobs on! As someone with a strong interest in the environment and transport, it’s clear that massive investment is needed that will ultimately save money, but affording that is always a challenge. Any mechanism like that – that real people can invest in – will be vitally important to our future prosperity and ultimately, keeping our heads above water.
Finally, I’ve been a little puzzled about the £1m home tax idea, which is being lauded and trumpeted as a new idea. It rang bells with me, because I’m sure it had been floated before in a Vince speech. He says in his own speech, “You may also recall that I proposed a small annual levy – half a penny in the pound – on property values over one million pounds.” With a bit of Google fu, I eventually found a story from the BBC saying Vince abandoned his £1m home tax in March 2008, following pressure from his colleagues that this would impact too much on the middle classes. Wind forward 18 months to an utterly different tax climate with a much greater willingness to clobber the wealthiest, and once again, Our Sainted Vince looks remarkably far-sighted.
Those links in full:
Lib Dems plan wealth tax on £1m homes (2007)
Why the Conservatives must stand up for the deserving rich
Cable rethink on high value homes
The current crop of Lord Bonkers’ diary entries for September’s Liberator are now available at diary secretary Jonathan Calder’s steam-driven weblog.
I have been snorting with laughter for days.
It does seem this year that the hashtag has landed this year. Hundreds of people are using twitter from conference. Hundreds of them are using the hashtag so that their thoughts can be shared with other similar users.
But it’s wider than that. People from other organisations are trying to use the hashtag to influence us, either from the voluntary orgs with stands at conference or from other parties trying to bait us into engaging with their views.
Here are some examples from the conference. RNID are using twitter to entice delegates to their stands – but once the delegates are there, RNID tweet the results of their conversations with the people who come to their stand.
Party IT provides Matt Raines and Tim Prater are tweeting from their stand – providing hot tips on quiet times to visit the exhibition and detailed restaurant reviews helping share intelligence between delegates.
Some tweeters are giving line by line commentary of the meetings and main stage events they were at – sometimes giving contradictory views of the same event. When Vince mentioned LVT (by principle, not by name), @jamesgraham exploded into paroxysms (”++ LAND VALUE TAX MENTIONED BY VINCE !!!1!11! OMG !! OMG !! ++”) but @adam_grant_bell responded rather more lukewarmly: “Rather scattered applause to Cable’s LVT suggestion. Good – no regressive tax, please #ldconf”. All in all, it reflects the diversity of opinion that people bring with them to conference.
The spectacle of people from other parties and none engaging with us through twitter is also an interesting phenomenon. To start with, there are the usual chunter merchants who inhabit pretty much every thread online to dismiss us out of hand with hilarious puns based on our name like “Lib Dim”. Since they dismiss us out of hand, we will do likewise to their usually inconsequential analysis.
Ever so slightly more substantially, is @kerryMP, Labour’s Twitter Tzar. Now I don’t know the MP in question, but I think it’s fair to say that on the basis of the twitter account, one barely gets the sense of a towering intellect. Kerry has started a “RT campaign” (which is, I suppose, the twitter equivalent of a postcard campaign”) to get the Lib Dem hierarchy to specify whether or not they would do a deal with a Tory minority government. And whilst Labour politicians are raising the scary spectre of Lib/Con coalition, Tory sources are pointing us at Tim Montgomerie’s piece suggesting we are on for a return of Lib/Labbery. (Kudos to Tim, while we’re on that topic, for updating his post in the light of our own research into the matter.)
Naturally, as a party of 10% of the MPs, 20% of the vote at the last election and 20% of the kingdom’s councillors, it’s not really our concern at this stage of the cycle to cosy up to one of the larger parties – but both of those other parties have a vested interest in portraying us as too closely aligned with the other to be of interest to their floating voters.
But as we heard at our fringe on Saturday night, it’s not the medium, it’s the message. So whilst the coalition chatter has begun on twitter, expect it to spill over into the rest of the world for the rest of the general election campaign.
Alex Foster has been encouraging politicians to use twitter for years, and has recently featured in his local newspaper. LDV will be running a fringe on Twitter on Wednesday.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Just over an hour ago, our fearless leader Nick Clegg left the stage to tumultuous applause following a frank Q&A with delegates.
Below is the audio recording made by our intrepid reporter by sitting in the audience with a MP3 recorder. And with access to a loaned MacBook, I’ve been able to process the sound much more quickly.
If you hear whispering and shuffling in the recording it’s because a group of media delegates were chattering to each other all through the recording. How nice, then, that one of them subsequently pronounced positively on Clegg’s performance. (At least, I think it was him, but his twitter account has no mugshot)
After a day of Linux updates on an incredibly elderly IBM Thinkpad, we can now finally bring you the audio recording of last night’s highly successful fringe meeting with Mark Pack, James Graham, Neil Fawcett and Lynne Featherstone MP.
And most unusually for fringe meetings in general, and definitely a first for an LDV fringe – our meeting got written up in the Guardian’s Comment is Free.
Niles's Blog 