I just ran the Pre-amble to the Lib Dem Constitution through Wordle.net and got this rather beautiful jumble of text.
Maybe we should put it on t-shirts.
I just ran the Pre-amble to the Lib Dem Constitution through Wordle.net and got this rather beautiful jumble of text.
Maybe we should put it on t-shirts.
An interesting post on Magistrate’s Blog gives us a picture of armed response police officers and asks why some of them are wearing balaclavas that obscure their identities.
I think the fact that the picture is still easy to find months after the incident probably answers the question. It seems entirely fair to officers put in this really difficult situation that they not become public figures because of the actions they have to carry out.
I wouldn’t want to be an armed policeman, and I sure as heck don’t want to see the police carrying guns as a matter of routine. But I entirely understand that we need some officers to be armed, and I hope I never find myself in a situation where I need them.
It is interesting, though, that although both armed cops and magistrates will simply because of their jobs from time to time have to take decisions that prove controversial in the long run, you’re currently not allowed to take photos of magistrates on the job. I wonder how Magistrate would feel to see his photo in a tabloid along with some rabble-rousing copy along the lines of “THIS IS THE BEAK THAT LET THE PAEDO GO”.
All this may change – there are plans at Lib Dem conference to debate letting cameras into court. I wonder if Magistrate will start wearing a balaclava if his decisions get opened to wider scrutiny.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Powered by Twitter Tools.
Powered by Twitter Tools.