<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excellent transport initiative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexfoster.me.uk/2009/10/30/excellent-transport-initiative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexfoster.me.uk/2009/10/30/excellent-transport-initiative/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: niles</title>
		<link>http://alexfoster.me.uk/2009/10/30/excellent-transport-initiative/#comment-1329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[niles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexfoster.me.uk/?p=2492#comment-1329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s more of a &quot;junction improvement&quot; scheme than a &quot;widening scheme&quot; - the widening is limited to one lane, in one direction, for only a small bit of the route, whilst the junction improvements will be at 10 different junctions - major traffic interventions to keep traffic moving.  And the widening is kinda quid pro quo for the Turning Point scheme in the city centre that actually reduced road space for cars and reduced traffic considerably.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more of a &#8220;junction improvement&#8221; scheme than a &#8220;widening scheme&#8221; &#8211; the widening is limited to one lane, in one direction, for only a small bit of the route, whilst the junction improvements will be at 10 different junctions &#8211; major traffic interventions to keep traffic moving.  And the widening is kinda quid pro quo for the Turning Point scheme in the city centre that actually reduced road space for cars and reduced traffic considerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://alexfoster.me.uk/2009/10/30/excellent-transport-initiative/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexfoster.me.uk/?p=2492#comment-1328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;ve got a bit too much faith in road widening making things &#039;better&#039;.

You widen a road and traffic increases to fill it as people now perceive it to be a viable route again. In time it just becomes jammed up again.

Kind of the opposite of what we want in traffic volume terms, jam problem only temporarily solved and residents&#039; quality of life decreased.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ve got a bit too much faith in road widening making things &#8216;better&#8217;.</p>
<p>You widen a road and traffic increases to fill it as people now perceive it to be a viable route again. In time it just becomes jammed up again.</p>
<p>Kind of the opposite of what we want in traffic volume terms, jam problem only temporarily solved and residents&#8217; quality of life decreased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

